Teodorian
Aktiv medlem
Tankar från en preview av D3 och D300 (http://www.e-fotografija.si/templates/?a=1154&z=93&page=3):
"But when it comes to high ISO performance, the Nikon D3 is a real champ. Even at ISO 1600, the advantage compared to D2Xs and D300 is marked. The D2Xs has incredibly strong noise reduction, which obliterates fine detail. The D300 is less heavy handed in this regard, but still, detail is lacking. Compare that to the D3, however, and it's a whole different thing – ISO 1600 on D3 is comparable to ISO 400 on D2Xs. Everything said so far is obviously true. With the new sensor and the new algorithms, the D3 achieved or even surpassed (we'll have to see about that in a direct comparison) the image quality of Canon EOS 1D Mk III. In addition, the camera goes up to ISO 25,600, with image quality that's perfectly acceptable for photojournalism. As I mentioned before, I've been in scanning for the past 31 years. In other words, I've been in prepress long enough to know what kind of image quality is required for printed material. To put it another way, the D3 has more detail at ISO 25600 than the other two cameras, D2Xs and D300, at ISO 1600. There's a bit more grain, but that's only noticeable at 100% crops."
Det bådar gott för D3 men inte för D300 (?).
"But when it comes to high ISO performance, the Nikon D3 is a real champ. Even at ISO 1600, the advantage compared to D2Xs and D300 is marked. The D2Xs has incredibly strong noise reduction, which obliterates fine detail. The D300 is less heavy handed in this regard, but still, detail is lacking. Compare that to the D3, however, and it's a whole different thing – ISO 1600 on D3 is comparable to ISO 400 on D2Xs. Everything said so far is obviously true. With the new sensor and the new algorithms, the D3 achieved or even surpassed (we'll have to see about that in a direct comparison) the image quality of Canon EOS 1D Mk III. In addition, the camera goes up to ISO 25,600, with image quality that's perfectly acceptable for photojournalism. As I mentioned before, I've been in scanning for the past 31 years. In other words, I've been in prepress long enough to know what kind of image quality is required for printed material. To put it another way, the D3 has more detail at ISO 25600 than the other two cameras, D2Xs and D300, at ISO 1600. There's a bit more grain, but that's only noticeable at 100% crops."
Det bådar gott för D3 men inte för D300 (?).
