Minolta scan dual 2 vs. canon fs4000us
- Trådstartare Paulo
- Start datum
Omar
Aktiv medlem
Har precis själv beställt en Canon fs4000us, ca 7300 kr från Tyskland. Det verkar inte vara någon scanner som slår den i sin prisklass. Men en del verkar ha haft problem med denna scanner på olika sätt, canon kanske har rättat till det nu, samt att visa menar att den inte är så bra på att scanna dia, men man kanske får justera bilden en del så man får det bra. Nikons motsvarighet är snabbare (Fire-wire) och sedan inte så mycket mer förutom bättre densitetsomfång. Men man blir lite kluven när man läser detta om Dmax.
Saxat från en test av Canon och Nikon 4000dpi på http://www.extremetech.com/article2/0,3973,10229,00.asp
Under "discussion"
"I was also puzzled by the published dMax specs on the Canon scanner, and I had a long discussion with Chuck Westfall of Canon USA about it. It turns out that Canon's early marketing materials (and much of what is published in the FS4000 manual and on the Canon web site) is incorrect.
The 3.4 number is correct for a 24-bit scan. In 42-bit mode, the correct dMax number is 4.2. This explains why there was so little difference between the scans of the contrasty slides.
Les Freed
PC Magazine
Saxat från en test av Canon och Nikon 4000dpi på http://www.extremetech.com/article2/0,3973,10229,00.asp
Under "discussion"
"I was also puzzled by the published dMax specs on the Canon scanner, and I had a long discussion with Chuck Westfall of Canon USA about it. It turns out that Canon's early marketing materials (and much of what is published in the FS4000 manual and on the Canon web site) is incorrect.
The 3.4 number is correct for a 24-bit scan. In 42-bit mode, the correct dMax number is 4.2. This explains why there was so little difference between the scans of the contrasty slides.
Les Freed
PC Magazine
Senast ändrad:
