I have'nt uset it... ...but "trasket" is unfair! If you need it....OK. If your pics. "looks" like HDR...I don't like it. If I don't like it. it's minus one..... Alf, like me, has used "HDR" for several years....analog, and digital PS (hehe)... Aber doch; as the Germans says; who knew????

Big wish!!!! 10 to 300mm seems like a full frame camera. Getting down to 10mm on a "step down" APS are difficult. Kind as I am; this should be an 5D Canon...... If you have an as full of SEK; the 1DsMIII makes greater respect by your neighbours.......

Do you have an analog PS????? sell me a copy :-)

So....what do you call that; if not HDR?

Jupp! Great dynamic range. Fuji S5, and Sigma SD14... But, alas, it's not dramatic better. < than 2 stops. Close to analog film, but not better. HDR are your only salvator, in your case. Shure you can -expose, and lift the lower parts in your RAW-converter....but that result in noice in the...

It's a good start for your software :-) Remember. To be valuable; you need to present invoices for prox. SEK 450K/year to make any profit; with a investment of SEK 60K. (You can't draw benefit from nothing)

Nope! Polarizer ONLY reduces highlighs, in matter of DR. Compose your pics. as we always have done in photography. As Magnus says. If your know your camaras limits, the problem are negotiable.

Timo. Your eye has far more dynamic range than your camera. It's not possible to compete wih your eye. Your only walk-around are to take several exposures, with minimum +2 and -2 EV(may be more), and combine them with HDR-tecknic. You will meet the same problen on a bright day, when the sun ask...

The Pirate Bay?

Cool? Shure! May cameras look like Colts.

Why not PSE 6.0? Prox. $90- It handles the ACR 4.+, and you can keep your CS2 for the tricky work.

*LOL* Blonda...

The new Seconic L-758DR http://www.sekonic.com/products/products.asp?ID=130

Sorry Sam :-( Canon FD is a bayonet; not M42. The "new" and "old" FD are similar. /Emil