Superzoom till NEX 3/5 "nära lansering"
- Trådstartare tannler
- Start datum
jonas_erik
Avslutat medlemskap
Ja det gör det. MVH.
tannler
Aktiv medlem
Pl's 'old your 'orses - vi vet ännu inte vad den presterar. Det finns all anledning att vara försiktig med superzoomar. De är per definition kompromisser och de måste leverare i någon annan espekt än zoomomfång, ex.vis bildkvalitet.
Jag köpte en Häxa när den kom ut, bara för att genast returnera den. Nu står mitt hopp till NEX3 och 18-200 OSS. Levererar den inte - så sitter jag nöjd med min gamla KM A2, trots att den bara klarar 28-200.
Jag köpte en Häxa när den kom ut, bara för att genast returnera den. Nu står mitt hopp till NEX3 och 18-200 OSS. Levererar den inte - så sitter jag nöjd med min gamla KM A2, trots att den bara klarar 28-200.
screamin-daemon
Aktiv medlem
Ser faktiskt lite tufft ut på NEX-VG10E
http://www.dpreview.com/news/1008/10081205sony18200mmemount.asp
http://www.dpreview.com/news/1008/10081205sony18200mmemount.asp
pallep
Aktiv medlem
hmm först nu jag fattar hur liten den videokameran är.
pallep
Aktiv medlem
Och först nu fattar jag att det inte är internzoom på 18-200mm. Borde man kunnat räkna ut.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/virgile-fontaine/4888471034/
några bilder med objektivet
http://www.flickr.com/photos/virgile-fontaine/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/virgile-fontaine/4888471034/
några bilder med objektivet
http://www.flickr.com/photos/virgile-fontaine/
hell_se
Aktiv medlem
Hyfsad recension från Photozone.de
Länk
Verdict
The Sony E 18-200mm f/3.5-6.3 OSS is a refreshingly different approach compared to most of the competition. It's not a purposely under-designed lens for cost-cutting measurements. This is most obvious with respect to its build quality - the stylish metal body clearly stands out from the rest of the crowd and it's a joy to handle it in the field despite the somewhat unusual/odd proportions compared to the tiny NEX camera. The optical quality is on a very decent level. It is not a flawless lens, of course, but the resolution figures are very fine in the lower portion of the zoom range and still good beyond. The distortion characteristic is about average for a lens in this class. The Sony lens produces a surprisingly low amount of vignetting even at "large" aperture settings (even in RAW images). The primary weakness of the lens are the lateral CAs at 18mm and 200mm although that's also rather typical for such lenses. The Sony lens is a pretty obvious choice for those seeking a one-lens-solution. The resulting package size may not be pocketable but, to be honest, neither is the 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS. The 18-200mm f/3.5-6.3 OSS is not a cheap lens (neither is e.g. the Panasonic 14-140mm OIS) but it's worth it ... if you can find a decent sample.
Optical Quality: ***
Mechanical Quality: ****
Price/Performance: ****
Länk
Verdict
The Sony E 18-200mm f/3.5-6.3 OSS is a refreshingly different approach compared to most of the competition. It's not a purposely under-designed lens for cost-cutting measurements. This is most obvious with respect to its build quality - the stylish metal body clearly stands out from the rest of the crowd and it's a joy to handle it in the field despite the somewhat unusual/odd proportions compared to the tiny NEX camera. The optical quality is on a very decent level. It is not a flawless lens, of course, but the resolution figures are very fine in the lower portion of the zoom range and still good beyond. The distortion characteristic is about average for a lens in this class. The Sony lens produces a surprisingly low amount of vignetting even at "large" aperture settings (even in RAW images). The primary weakness of the lens are the lateral CAs at 18mm and 200mm although that's also rather typical for such lenses. The Sony lens is a pretty obvious choice for those seeking a one-lens-solution. The resulting package size may not be pocketable but, to be honest, neither is the 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS. The 18-200mm f/3.5-6.3 OSS is not a cheap lens (neither is e.g. the Panasonic 14-140mm OIS) but it's worth it ... if you can find a decent sample.
Optical Quality: ***
Mechanical Quality: ****
Price/Performance: ****
